Oppo Reno 16 vs Vivo X300 FE
The Vivo X300 FE has the higher overall score (82 vs 72). The Oppo Reno 16 costs ₹72,999 and the Vivo X300 FE costs ₹89,999, so the Oppo Reno 16 is ₹17,000 cheaper.
The Oppo Reno 16 scores higher for software support.
The Vivo X300 FE scores higher for camera, battery, charging, performance, gaming, display and value.
Side by side, true scale
dimensions not confirmed
150.8 × 71.8 × 8.2 mm · 190 g
Drawn at 2.2 px per mm from maker-stated dimensions; grid squares are 5 mm.
Scores compared
Oppo Reno 16Vivo X300 FE 72 overall 82 60 camera 67 — video 88 81 battery 83 80 charging 88 52 performance 89 62 gaming 84 85 display 93 82 software support 70 100 durability 100 53 value 69
Not scored for either phone yet (too few confirmed inputs): selfie and audio.
Specifications side by side
| Spec | Oppo Reno 16 | Vivo X300 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Price (from) | ₹72,999 | ₹89,999 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| Display size | 6.32" | 6.31" |
| Refresh rate | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,600 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Battery | 6,700 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80W | 90W |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | 3.5× | 3× |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Weight | — | 190 g |
| Thickness | — | 8.2 mm |
| OS upgrades | 5 years | 4 years |
| Water resistance | IP66/IP68/IP69 | IP68/IP69 |
Generated from our data on 2026-10-24. Sources are on each phone's page: Oppo Reno 16, Vivo X300 FE.