Motorola Razr Fold vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Vivo X300 Ultra has the higher overall score (89 vs 85). The Motorola Razr Fold costs ₹1,49,999 and the Vivo X300 Ultra costs ₹1,59,999, so the Motorola Razr Fold is ₹10,000 cheaper.
The Motorola Razr Fold scores higher for display and software support.
The Vivo X300 Ultra scores higher for camera, battery, charging, performance, gaming and value.
Side by side, true scale
dimensions not confirmed
163 × 76.8 × 8.2 mm · 232 g
Drawn at 2.2 px per mm from maker-stated dimensions; grid squares are 5 mm.
Scores compared
Motorola Razr FoldVivo X300 Ultra 85 overall 89 77 camera 82 86 video — 67 battery 82 89 charging 90 90 performance 96 86 gaming 91 94 display 93 100 software support 89 100 durability 100 54 value 62
Not scored for either phone yet (too few confirmed inputs): selfie and audio.
Specifications side by side
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Price (from) | ₹1,49,999 | ₹1,59,999 |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Display size | 8.1" | 6.82" |
| Refresh rate | 120Hz | 144Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,200 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Battery | 6,000 mAh | 6,600 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80W | 100W |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3.7× |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Weight | — | 232 g |
| Thickness | — | 8.2 mm |
| OS upgrades | 7 years | 5 years |
| Water resistance | IP48/IP49 | IP68/IP69 |
Generated from our data on 2026-10-24. Sources are on each phone's page: Motorola Razr Fold, Vivo X300 Ultra.